As you move further west in the country, water becomes all the more scarce, and thus its sources become all the more precious. Yet the relationship between water’s preciousness and how it has been treated through our infrastructure is really an inverse one – especially in California. While water is gold here, its sources, and the rivers and streams that carry it, have been treated like nothing more than garbage – the above photo a case in point, which we snapped while taking a hike through Nature Park in South Pasadena. While there are indeed many efforts to improve our stormwater retention, daylight channelized rivers, and expand rainwater harvesting efforts, we cannot stop there. It behooves us as a state to treat water as the precious giver of life that it ultimately is, on all levels and in all ways.
The prevailing adage goes that our infrastructure reflects our values. Thus our transportation systems, with their high investment in roads and personal auto ownership, and low investment in rail and other transit networks, reflect our cultural propensity towards the individual and our reluctance to embrace a more collective cultural model. Yet what if this adage is wrong? What if the infrastructure we see does not so much reflect our cultural values but instead reflects the limited ways in which we plan and conduct outreach for our transportation systems in the first place?
See the full article on Streetsblog SF HERE.
At one time 100s of concrete water towers were constructed across Israel. Now, many have fallen into disrepair and remain unused. A recent design competition entitled Water Tower – New Perspectives called for submissions that offered up new visions for the water towers and their future. The winning entry, Habitat for Urban Wildlife, envisions the water towers as multi-layered, multi-functional spaces that attract everything from migratory bird species, to bats, to rainwater, which would collect on the roofs of the watertowers and be harvested for irrigation.
For more on the project, click here.